Quantcast
Channel: BimmerBoost - N54, N55, S55, N52
Viewing all 12473 articles
Browse latest View live

General: Guess who's back?

$
0
0
He popped up in the Zupra Facebook group no less, still flexing and brand name dropping like it's going out of style. I guess some people never change lol.

Does anyone still have a link to that old hysterical "Hitler's bunker" openflash tablet video from years ago? :)
Attached Images
  

General: N54 S55 ITB intake manifold by hyper-racing

$
0
0
Yet another intake manifold option! Someone finally made an ITB setup for the N54 and S55 with 52mm throttle bodies. It would involve custom fab intercooler piping and would eliminate the stock throttle body (I'm assuming). Made out of aluminium and nylon and comes at a price of 4299$ (AUD?). On a side note they also make a turbo upgrade for the S55.

https://shop.hyper-racing.net/collec...-intake-system

It looks like the air has to do a hard 90 degree turn as soon as it enters the intake manifold. I'm also curious how ITB's affect forced induction engines?

Thoughts?

Click here to enlarge
Attached Images
 

N54: IJEOS european 6at stock bin request

$
0
0
Hey guys, i tried to look all the downloads for euro spec ijeos map, i swapped my ecu from msd80->81 and the donor came from n53. I managed to find us spec map from here but now i'm getting some codes about missing that fuel ventilation system, used only in us cars.

Anyone has this map? Thanks already:)

S55: I fixed it myself, thanks VTT.

$
0
0
Purchased Vargas GC+ turbos on 6/27/2019 on sale for ~$3600 – received within a week.
Dropped the car off to my shop on 11/24/2019 after getting all my other parts stock piled.
The plan at the shop was as followed:
1 – Do a base line pull on the stock car with the BM3 Stage 1 tune
2 – Install Turbos, Crank hub, charge pipes, Intakes, Intercooler, Heat Exchanger, J pipe, downpipes and new colder plugs
3 – Tune the car on 93 pump gas, stock fuel system and compare and plan from there
Right out the gate we were having some codes from needing to adjust the gate in ISTA. Not a huge deal, pretty straight forward thing. My shop had it resolved quickly and started tuning the car. We were seeing weird bank to bank AFR variance. Vacuum and smoke tested the car and found no leaks so we decided to do the coils as well since the car was around 25k miles. This didn’t really fix the issue so we got the car to a good running point on low timing and low boost and I picked it up while we determined what to do next.
I drove the car ~50 miles back to my house and as I was pulling in my driveway I received the following code: 123518 - Electric wastegate 2, wastegate flap: sluggish
Called the shop, notified them of the issue and we started doing some research. Double checked the adjustment in ISTA and it was off. So we readjusted. The code came back. Verified the connection to the wastegate actuator wasn’t corroded or the wires weren’t pinched / melted somehow. Drive the car home after clearing the codes and over the course of the next few months got the code a bunch more times, the whole time researching and trying to resolve the issue (car drove fine and pulled fine, would throw the code, restart the car and the code was gone). In the BMW ISTA plan it recommends replacing the actuator, so even though it’s not a common thing, we figured $#@! it, these are brand new turbos so that might be the fix. Dropped $400 on a new actuator, adjusted in ISTA again and was still getting the same code. So I messaged Vargas.
Tony responds with the follow on 4/10/2020:
That is always an issue with wastegate adjustment. If it comes, and goes it usually means you have a iffy connection somewhere. Swapping the actuator is not going to fix that.

I would say
A: Poor connection, corroded connection on that bank EWG harness
B: Sticky wastegate which is easy to test, just pop the arm off if it moves free that is not your problem.

We then popped the arm off (while the turbo was in the car) to test the wastegate movement and it was moving just fine. I reported back to Tony and 5 days later got this:
I gave you the only two scenarios it can possibly be. Sticking gate or wiring issue. Its possible he also has them adjusted wrong, but if it clears sometimes then I doubt that is the case.

There is really nothing we can do without having the car here. Those are the 3 things I would look into. The turbos do not control boost in any way. Boost is controlled by the ECU and actuators. If you are g getting boost codes it's one of those things 99% of the time.

After talking to my tuner and thinking about it, does the internal gate that’s physically part of the turbo not also help control the boost? Either way, after not being able to figure it out I made a few forum posts trying to get help. Chris responded to one and the email chain was picked back up by him on 4/27/2020.
Chris told me the following:
If you've done those troubleshooting steps, then really the car needs to be looked at in person. There are some things that really need an experienced eye to look over.
So I responded with:
Great, I can have my shop check it out, we just need to know what to look at / for.
In which Chris responded with this:
We may be miscommunicating. We gave you the things to look at, you're saying you addressed those things. Additional troubleshooting would start with us -in person- validating all of those things were done correctly, with a hand over hand in-depth look/touch/validation of each of those steps, as well as an overview of anything in the general vicinity. Anyone that is touching your car should inherently have this knowledge and capability, if your local shop can't do it for you then you need to find someone who will. I understand this can be frustrating, but troubleshooting over email only goes so far. There is a big difference between being able to bolt on parts and fully understanding how things integrate. This could be caused by some minor misunderstanding or mistep at a variety of points along the appraisal and inspection. That's why Tony was saying he'd need to see the car in person to continue to help diagnose.

Did you do the work yourself? If not, what shop did? Are they the same shop you're going to go back to for inspection? Have you tried any software adjustments? What tune is on the car? Are there other shops local to you that maybe have a better understanding? See the direction I'm going?

I'm trying to push you to get new (to you), experienced eyes on the situation as most likely it's something being overlooked.

Basically blame anything but the turbo, no way it could be the turbo. After a little back and forth, on 5/1/2020 I emailed them stating the following:
My shop is thinking that it might be possible that the housing isn't clocked 100% correctly and might be slightly binding the gate causing my issue. Have you guys ever seen that happen before? Do you guys clock the turbos on a jig to make sure they are as close as possible?
Chris came back with:
We have not seen that before.

Generally speaking, every part of the turbo build is a controlled assembly. Could have happened during installation perhaps?

At this point I was getting frustrated. I pin pointed the car would only throw the code while decelerating. Basically when the gate wants to slam open to bleed off boost. After some more back and forth, the whole time giving them the benefit of the doubt, they finally tell me on 5/20/2020 that if I think it’s defective I can send it back. So I schedule shop time to pull the turbo and send it to them. The shop clamped to a welding bench and pulled measurements from the stock turbo vs the VTT one and noticed that it did in fact seem to be clocked wrong. I finally get to speak to Chris on the phone on 6/11/2020. He mentioned to me to make sure it’s packaged extra good because they have had things damaged during shipping. I told my shop what I was told and they made sure to package it well. I informed Chris that I would be shipping the turbo back with the new Electronic Actuator on it so that Tony could inspect it exactly how it came out of the car.

After almost 2 weeks in the mail and some crazy delayed shipping (assuming due to COVID) they finally receive the turbo in the mail on 6/22/2020. After 9 business days the turbo finally ships out to me. All I received was an automated email with tracking so I emailed Chris on 7/2/2020 to see what they found out. I was curious to know if Tony found any issues with the turbo so I could put my mind to ease. Chris said We didn’t see anything awry with it, but sent you a new one just in case. “. I felt this was a little odd because as a business I wouldn’t ship out a brand new $1800 turbo “just in case” but I figured, $#@! it, take it and hope it fixes the issue! I asked about the actuator that we shipped with it and was told they didn’t even bother swapping the actuator over to the new turbo because it came damage with a cracked plug and that something must have happened during shipping.

On 7/8/2020 I receive the new turbo in the mail and bring it to my shop. We open it up and notice that it’s not a new turbo at all. The CHRA and cold side housing were the ones we shipped to them, they just replaced the exhaust housing. Ok, Tony did the work, might have been miscommunication between him and Chris. Once again, still giving them the benefit of the doubt. That’s when we decided to clamp them both back to the bench and double check the measurements. The VTT turbo CHRA was clocked 13 degrees off the stock turbo and the cold side housing was also off enough to make the wastegate arm not straight. We hook the actuator and arm up to the stock turbo, goes on nice and easy and straight. We move it back to the VTT turbo, was much harder to put on and the arm wasn’t straight still… So we start looking a little closer and notice the tab that comes out of the exhaust housing that the arm attaches to is TWISTED. On a brand new exhaust housing.. twisted. So I email Chris again with pictures showing how it’s twisted and how the arm sits. I was told to just bend it straight. That’s right, just bend it straight on a brand new exhaust housing that “every part of the turbo is built in a controlled assembly”. This is LITERALLY the reason I shipped it with the actuator. So it could all be checked before shipping it back to me.

After talking with my shop we decide to just make the VTT turbo meet the OEM turbos measurements on clocking angle on the CHRA and cold side housing. We couldn’t move the CHRA because it’s pinned to the exhaust side housing, so we disassembled the turbo to pull the pin and made it match the OEM turbo. Did the same with the cold side. And you guessed it.. BENT the tab straight. Now the actuator and arm go on straight with no binding issues. We installed it into the car and adjusted the arm in ISTA and tossed it on the Dyno.

Boost is dialed in via Wastegate Duty Cycle. On the 26psi tune that was in the car we let out at 34psi @ 4k RPM. Wow, looks like the gate is fixed. Adjusted the WGDC and now the car spools 500rpm sooner at the same boost level and I haven’t had a single code in over a week. No more weird bank to bank AFR variance either. Guess our initial diagnosis on 5/1/2020 was right! Should have pulled and checked the turbo sooner, but assuming it’s high quality and gets some sort of quality control we didn’t bother.

I have since asked for them to cover the ~$1500 I'm out in extra shop time swapping this turbo and diagnosis the problem since I feel this is a failure on their end. I was told the following: After initial troubleshooting was not successful, we encouraged you to send them to us for inspection. We inspected the unit, found nothing wrong and replaced the housings for no charge because we stand behind our products. All 200+ sets of these we have sold have broken records and ran trouble free pinned the same. The number of wastegate issues can be counted on one hand, using two fingers. If you are unhappy we totally understand and you can remove the units and return them for a full refund for your trouble. Outside of that there is nothing we are offering as far as monetary compensation.

The other "wastegate issue" can be found on my other thread (images oddly look exactly like mine) found here by MikeeM4: https://www.bimmerboost.com/showthre...547#post840547

I'll add images of my stock vs VTT turbo below.

N54: Prelim Dyno Results RB Turbos Game Finisher 19t

$
0
0
Been following this thread for many months now and thought I'd chime in on my prelim Dyno results a couple weeks ago.

I've had the GF's on the car now for about 3 months now and have put about roughly 2000 miles on them so far with 0 issues. These are prelim #s due to the fact that I'm currently waiting on a PI setup and I've chosen not to further tune the car with the HOD. Plain and simple! Went through 2 revisions with Trebila and these were the results.

Attachment 60939
SAE DYNO RESULTS:
586whp/535wtq

STD:
598whp/546wtq

Tuner:
This was my first time going through the whole custom tuning experience. I must say Trebila made it very easy. Super knowledgable and also helped me troubleshoot a minor misfire situation.
Results made on a MHD BEF running E60 at about 23psi. I haven't even begun to reach anywhere near the full potential of these turbos or fueling for that matter. Logs were very clean and modest.

Mods:
07 335i Manual (stock motor)
RB Turbos Game Finisher 19t
Swaintech Coating on Turbo Manifolds
RB Turbo Inlets/Outlets
N54 Tuning DownPipes
Beluga Racing Exhaust
CSF Radiator
XClutch SMFW Twin Disc xClutch
Mosselman Thermostat+Oil Cooler
Fuelit Stage 3 bucketless
525 Primary Walboro Bucketless
450 Secondary Bucketless
Fuel-It ethanol analyzer for JB4
15 PSI Hobbs Switch
Standard Helix OD
RevIt Trans Mounts (Green)
RevIt Motor Mounts (Green)
3.5 Bar TMAP Sensor
ER Charge Pipe
Forge Diverter Valves
97506 NGK Plugs Gapped @0.20
Eldor Coil Packs
JB4 G5
MHD Backend Flash
RB N54 External PCV Kit
Mishimoto High side oil catch can
Mishimoto Lower catch can

Big shout out to SDGarage and RB Turbos. This build was well worth the wait!

-GII
Attached Images
 

N54: Vargas Valve cover installed and now my car smokes!

$
0
0
Hi All. Just had a Vargas CNC non-cast Valve cover installed on my N54, 25k on new crate engine. Single Mishi catch can on the cold side. engine never smoked before. RB drain lines, nothing else done, and it smokes at idle, catch can is clean. After driving for a few minutes, no smoke at idle. Let the car cool down and start it again, smoke is back. Again, there was no smoke before the VC change. I know the new VC does not have the internal parts that the stock one does. How can I get it to stop smoking? I believe I need more vacuum. But then again I am a noob so...

N54: New N54 "DIY Series" LPFP Kits

$
0
0
Hey guys,

In part due to the current world situation, seems people are enjoying the challenge (and savings) associated with a little more hands-on approach to LPFP upgrades on the N54 platform. This in mind we're offering some kits that allow the DIY'er the flexibility to do things their way with production quality parts -just add whatever pump(s) you want!

For those that want to DIY their own bucketed pump, we make it easy. We have options for single and double pump kits, with or without tophats, and for double pump setups you get to choose with or without wiring kit/hobbs trigger.

It starts with a venturi, sized for the flow demands of single or double pumps, tested and plastic welded in place for security. Securing the pumps is accomplished through either a modified OEM pump holder, or a PFS double pump clamp (39mm diameter pumps such as Walbro). If using two pumps, rest assured the wiring and terminal hardware is heavy duty, tested, and installed for you if you opt to pick up a new tophat at the same time.

https://performancefuelingsolutions....ade-diy-series


Click here to enlarge

Click here to enlarge

Click here to enlarge

Click here to enlarge

Want a bucketless setup? The same options -single or double pump systems- apply across the board at a price that doesn't hurt the wallet.

https://performancefuelingsolutions....ade-diy-series


Click here to enlarge

Click here to enlarge

Don't see what you like? Want something more wild? DIY external systems? Maybe just over your head with your own DIY creation and need some help? Shoot an email over to sales@performancefuelingsolutions.com and lets get started on a custom solution for you, assembled and tested to your specs, or simply delivered for you to do the fun work.


Chris
Attached Images
      

N55: 2011 535i F10: Low Target Boost, no Error Codes

$
0
0
Hello Guys,


I have a problem with my car and couldn´t find a solution.
It started a few weeks ago on a long distance autobahn trip it felt like not having full power.
The next week again on the autobahn i was pretty sure that something was wrong.


Read the codes and it said the IAT-Sensor is faulty (jumped to -40°C often).


Bought a new one and installed a aluminium charge pipe.
No Error code but still no power.


Bought MHD to monitor and because I wanted it anyway.
Made a log completely stock (Without MHD installed).


2020-07-19 09_26_33 00000D07596401 Unknown.csv

I can only see that the boost target is to low (between 0,2 and 0,36 bar/ 3-5 psi)


I hope you can help me read the data and to find the error or faulty part.


I checked the boost solenoid: vacuum (-950mbar) is going in and when i apply voltage (~11V) vacuum goes out (-500mbar)
If I apply vaccum to the wastegate is moving. Thats what I could check from above so far.


Thanks in advance!


Jan

N54: Is port injection safe now or will it still be a risk to my car?

$
0
0
I'm currently considering port injection. I've read in some old threads about there being no way for the DME to stop the PI from spraying fuel when safety conditions occur, causing things to go kaboom. Does PI on N54 now have a way of implementing proper safety or is PI still a risk?

Also will port injection negatively effect my gas mileage when just putting around town? The majority of my driving is inner-city.

Thanks

N54: Midnight Motorsports N54 throttle body injection kit

$
0
0
I've never heard of Midnight Motorsports and their website doesn't work which isn't a good sign. Maybe one of you guys knows who they are?

Just saw they have a throttle body injection kit coming but no pricing or details beyond this. Maybe best avoided? Who knows.

Click here to enlarge

Click here to enlarge

Click here to enlarge

N54: 500 whp 93 octane hybrid 17t E90 N54 335i build

$
0
0
Nothing crazy here but a nice pump gas sleeper IMO. E90 335i with 17T billet hybrids and that is all I know about the turbos.

CES Motorsport did the tune. Index-12 injector, new NGK gapped plugs, no coils, Stage 2 LPFP, VR Speed intercooler, and tuned through MHD.

A nice, realistic, daily setup:

Click here to enlarge

Click here to enlarge

Click here to enlarge

Click here to enlarge

N54: Stock O2 breakpoints

$
0
0
Hi All,

i've read theads on the ADV sensor testing for different o2 sensors from years ago and jake showed a screenshot of an XDF with a "lambda" category with a bunch of additional tables defined within.

What i've looking for is the stock formula for wbo2 volts to AFR (if it exists).

I'm using a jb4 on an older vehicle and i'd like to see if i can get my wbo2 configured similarly so i can log AFR properly on the jb4.

Thanks

S55: Stock motor VTT GC Equipped M4 walking Fully built motor Kratos M4

N54: Stock IJE0S BIN with 29F4 and 29F5 CEL disabled?

$
0
0
Hey guys,


I’m looking to disable the CEL resulting from aftermarket DPs on a 2010 335i 6MT RWD car with an IJE0S DME. I have a copy of the BB App and TunerPro, and the IJE0S XDF, as well as a high speed KDCAN cable. Can you please help me obtain the right BIN to fix this CEL, and am I right in assuming that I simply need to load that BIN into BB APP and then write to the car? No other tools/SW needed? Not looking to tune the car to any other changes, hence this request...


I'm familiar with hex editing such diagnostic codes from triggering on MSS54, but never attempted it on a newer E9X platform car/DME.


Thank you for any help!


S55: RK Autowerks redesigns their S55 crank hub fix from 2 pin to 4 pin

$
0
0
Interesting to see this as we were discussing crank hubs not too long ago.

There were those who said just adding more pins is pointless yet here we are with the design going from 2 pins to 4:

Click here to enlarge

Quote:

Due to all the requests, we updated our S55 crank hubs to a 4 pin design. The 2 pin design is still available for shops and individuals interested.

Our crank hubs are milled from a solid piece of heat treated chromoly, right here in the shop. These are the perfect solution for peace of mind when pushing the power on your M3, M4, or M2C.

N54: ABR Houston N54 Engine Build Issues and general maintenance problems

$
0
0
There are some negative ABR Houston stories coming out and this was sent to me. Make of it what you will but you should at least be able to read it:

Quote:

Hello Administrator,

I have been in communication with a close friend of mine - Deen. He encouraged that I reach out to you involving an incident I experienced when I had my car shipped to ABR Houston for repairs.

I feel it's important to convey to the BMW community what transpired with my dealings with ABR. I essentially was defrauded out of $3000 dollars for a improper diagnosis of a straightforward repair job.

I have attached a letter from the mechanic that properly repaired my vehicle along with my transcript with the Better Business Bureau.

Thank you for your time and consideration
Click here to enlarge

DearBBB,
Iwould like to take this opportunity to respond to the many falsestatements described by Mr. Noll. I am quite shocked and literallyspeechless to Mr. Noll’s direct fictitious description of theevents that transpired over a course of 5 months. I will respondhonestly, concisely, and factitiously in an effort to present Mr.Noll’s inability to diagnose a straightforward repair job.
MESSAGEFROM BUSINESS:

Alex Noll’s response: Phuong Khac Vu shippedhis vehicle, a 2009 BMW 335Xi to us under the assumption his recentlybuilt performance engine installed in the vehicle had failed. Thisengine was not built nor had ABR been involved in this engine orvehicle before this transaction. The vehicle as presented was notreadily drivable, it ran albeit very poorly, and it was fitted withrace-slicks, (non-road legal tires) among many other aftermarketmodifications already installed on the vehicle at its time ofarrival. The vehicle was shipped prematurely, as we had told Mr. Vuthat we would not be able to touch the vehicle for 1-2 months atbest. This was further compounded with the natural disaster thathappened in Houston while his vehicle was in ourpossession. Thankfully no damage or loss happened to theproperty during this natural disaster/

Dr.Vu’s response: I have proof in a messenger communication where Ispecifically asked Mr. Noll for an estimated time frame to repair myvehicle once it was in his possession. The time frame he provided was1 to 2 months. I am quite astonished that Mr. Noll would create afictitious statement which I can disprove with a screen shot from myFacebook messenger. I described to Mr. Noll that my car wasdisplaying a vanos fault code 2A98 camshaft crankshaft correlationfault. My engine was built and assembled locally and I had beendriving the vehicle for several months without incident. When Ideveloped the vanos fault code, I had taken my vehicle to a localrepair shop where they attempted to repair the fault code by retimingthe engine. Shortly thereafter the motor slipped time and the samevanos fault code returned. The local shop communicated that they werenot able to diagnose the reason for the return of the vanos faultcode. They also communicated that it would be in my best interest toseek assistance by a BMW specialist shop. It was at this point whereI made the decision to contact Mr. Noll. I described in detail thehistory of a recent timing repair that immediately failed.

Mr.Noll’s response:Upon bringing the vehicle in for initialdiagnostics we found the oil filter full of metallic particulate, asPhuong stated it would be, and what had led him to the assumption hisengine was bad and/or damaged and needed to be rebuilt. We concludedotherwise after a thorough examination of the engine and determinedfrom the stored fault codes and through physical means the engine wasout of timing. We provided Phuong an estimate to remove thevalve cover and check the camshaft timing with BMW special tools of$3000, which was approved by him. This approval was given in writingvia Facebook Messenger, Phuong’s chosen communicationpreference. Once the valve cover and aftermarket turbochargerwere removed, it was possible to install the BMW special timing toolset and verify physically the timing between the camshafts andcrankshaft was not in correct correlation. Our technician proceededto reset engine timing to factory specifications per our writtenestimate and carried out all work as discussed with the client. Wealso checked the camshaft trays, and found that the incorrect steelrings were installed on the new components. We replaced them with thecorrect updated "blocking rings" to properly repair thisissue, since it directly relates to the correlation and performanceof the timing system (but not the mechanical aspect of being out oftime).The engine was reassembled and started. Idle was smooth and theengine was now running well in the service bay with no fault codesreturning for camshaft timing, like the vehicle originally waspresented with. The initial test drive yielded satisfactory resultswith the engine running as intended under light driving conditions onsurface streets (+/- 40mph). Test drives were very limited for safetyreasons as the weather was cold, damp and the tires fitted to thevehicle were non DOT approved race slicks with no tread at all. Whenweather allowed, a test drive was made with data logging software tocapture all aspects of engine running variables. We sent theinformation to a very well respected and known engine tuner forevaluation. The engine tune installed in the vehicle was dangerouslylean and all further driving aside from moving at parking lot speedswas out of the question until this was rectified.

Dr.Vu’s response: Mr. Noll’s statement that he was test driving thecar to 40 mph is completely false. I have in my possession 6 datalogswhich recorded several parameters which include but not limited tothe following: RPM, gear, fuel trims, air/fuel ratio, mapdesignation, ignition timing, lpf, hpf, amongst many others. It iswithin these 6 datalogs where I can prove Mr. Noll has again provideduntruthful statements. I have evidence that Mr. Noll in factaccelerated my car well past 80 mph under 100% throttle on severaloccasions. In addition it was within these datalogs where I noticedMr. Noll lacked a basic understanding of fuel trims and potentiallycaused internal motor damage. Due to Mr. Noll’s lack ofunderstanding to basic tuning parameters, he drove my car under heavyload with fuel trims completely maxed out. It is during theseinstances where detonation occurs which can lead to catastrophicengine failure. Furthermore, Mr. Noll did not activate my port fuelinjection system and this is the reason why the fuel trims were maxedout. Mr. Noll was completely unaware of the reason despite himdatalogging with a simple to use JB4 engine management controller. Itis within these datalogs where fuel trims are readily displayed sothat the end user can record and review them instantly. It literallytakes 10 seconds to toggle through the user adjustment setting andenter a few values to activate the port injection system. BurgerMotorsports has a step by step manual readily available on the onlineforums for customer and shop use. I was in disbelief when I reviewedthe datalogs and realized that Mr. Noll was completelyoblivious to driving my car with insufficient fueling to the motor. The only reason why my engine did not seize or throw aconnecting rod through the block is because I had a highconcentration of ethanol in the tank that aided in preventingcylinder detonation. Without that high concentration of ethanol, Mr.Noll would have been replacing my motor. The experienced tuner towhom Mr. Noll is referencing is unbeknownst to him my tuner as well.The tuner has communicated to me that Mr. Noll is clueless in thearea of tuning and has to forward all datalogs for him to review.

AlexNoll’s response: We expressed our concerns to Phuong over thestate of the engine tuning he had done elsewhere predating coming tous, the state and extent of the aftermarket performance componentsinstalled on the vehicle, and what we needed to do to move forward.Phuong declined having the engine tuning corrected while in ABR’scare, and declined all other recommended services including a faultylow pressure fuel sensor which the engine computer relies on as partof its fuel trim management system.

Dr.Vu’s response: I again have proof in Facebook messenger screenshotsthat will demonstrate clearly Mr. Noll’s attempt to falsifystatements. I have a screenshot where Mr. Noll communicated that hedid not want to step on the toes of my tuner and therefore he wouldtake care of the mechanical issue and I had the option of utilizinghis tuner if I chose to do so. Unknown to Mr. Noll, my vehicle isequipped with an external fuel pressure regulator and return line. Itis common sense that everyone running a fuel pressure regulator andreturn line must adjust the low pressure fuel between 60 and 65 psi.With a stock low pressure fuel pump and in tank fuel pressureregulator, the low pressure fuel is maintained at 72 psi by the DME. My car however is equipped with a Stage 3 Fuel IT fueling kitwhich utilizes two Walbro 450 low pressure fuel pumps. The DME is notcapable to read above 65 psi because it is limited by its duty cycle.My statement can be corroborated by Steve at Fuel IT whom is afueling specialist supplier for the N54 platform. To further provethat Mr. Noll is making false and inaccurate statements, I again canprovide datalogs demonstrating that my low pressure fuel is providingmore than adequate fuel pressure which again can be confirmed bySteve at Fuel IT. Mr. Noll not only has a below average understandingof basic tuning parameters, he also clearly lacks a basicunderstanding of how Stage 3 pumps operate. At low load and idle, theprimary pump is the only supplier of fuel to the motor. Once themotor is under load, the secondary fuel pump is activated by a Hobb’spressure switch located on the charge pipe. Again all 6 datalogs willnullify Mr. Noll’s statements and corroborate mine.

Mr.Noll’s response: At this time ABR had resolved the immediateproblem with the engine, but we stressed to Phuong it needed moreextensive test driving before we were confident this was the onlyissue with the vehicle. Phuong asked after all approved work wascompleted to check the crank hub, carry out a compression test, andconduct a leak down check, but decided against requested servicesafter noting it would be considerable rework and additional billedtime.

Dr.Vu’s response: I have proof in several Facebook screenshots whereMr. Noll stated that the car was idling and running perfect. He didprovide the option that I could utilize his tuner but that I couldfinish up the custom software tuning once I received my car back. Asstated above, Mr. Noll’s lack of basic tuning knowledge was thereason why he ran my motor with insufficient fueling. It is in myopinion as well as others that Mr. Noll enrolls in some continuingeducation courses in basic tuning parameters. In comparison, a personwith general software tuning knowledge would have taken one datalogand reviewed the parameters for values out of what would beconsidered normal. Mr. Noll however not only continued to push thecar under load but was also completely unaware of these basic tuningprinciples.

Mr.Noll’s response: ABR again communicated to Phuong no furtherdriving was possible, nor did it make any sense to further modify analready highly modified vehicle until the engine tuning was safelyestablished.

Dr.Vu’s response: I have a screenshot on Facebook messenger where Ihad to describe in detail as to the reason why the fuel trims weremaxed out. Mr. Noll’s lack of knowledge in how to activate the portfuel injection system is the reason why there was insufficientfueling to the engine. As described above, Mr. Noll despitedatalogging with a JB4 app, was lacking the basic procedural aptitudeto toggle through the user adjustment menu to simply change values toactivate the port fuel injectors.

Mr.Noll’s response: ABR awaited further instructionafter Phuong inquired about installing numerous additionalaftermarket modifications on the vehicle, including a ported/polishedstage 3 cylinder head, camshafts, an engine oil cooler, aftermarketfuel pumps, and aluminum radiator.

Dr.Vu’s response: I had inquired about an estimate on some otheraftermarket parts out of curiosity. I don’t see how this has anyrelevance to Mr. Noll’s improper diagnosis and failed repair job onmy vehicle. It clearly has no merit or significance to Mr. Noll’sinability to repair a vehicle.

Mr.Noll’s response: We offered a solution to the issue he wasconcerned about, and that was in development and could be installedon his vehicle to fix the hub concern of his. We explained we simplycould not just “check” the hub, as it is one time use items, andwould require us to retime the engine, yet once again. The correctivehub would’ve been released shortly for sale, and since the vehiclewas here we could install it- ending the concern of his. Phuonginitially said we were to keep the vehicle until the developed fixwas released (within Q1 of 2018), but hours later we learned thevehicle was being picked up from a transport driver calling to checkavailability to load it up. We then called Mr. Vu to confirm this wasnot a mix up, to which he replied that it was correct, the vehiclewas being picked up within 24 hours.

Dr.Vu’s response: I have Facebook messenger screenshots where Irepeatedly requested Mr. Noll to inspect my crank hub. It is wellknown in the BMW N54 335i community that the crank hub is known tofail and cause crankshaft to camshaft correlation faults identical tothose experienced by my motor. After describing my history with otherknowledgeable BMW technicians including the technician that repairedmy issue, they have communicated to me that Mr. Noll neglected toinspect vital components that have a direct relationship tocrankshaft to camshaft correlation faults. It is in theirprofessional opinion that it is standard practice to inspect thevanos cam gears, camshafts, crank hub assembly along with thecorresponding timing sprocket, oil pump sprocket and grip disks. Mr.Noll completely ignored mechanical components that directly influencecam shaft timing. Despite multiple requests to have the crank hubinspected albeit under my cost, Mr. Noll continued to ensure me thatthe crank hub was fine. Consequently, due to Mr. Noll’s inabilityand or complete indifference to follow proper diagnostic protocol, myvehicle experienced a third timing failure immediately followingconservative software tuning by none other than the exact same tunerthat Mr. Noll utilizes. I have multiple screenshots where Mr. Nolldescribed that it would be perfectly fine to arrange my vehicle forshipment with a recommendation that I finish the custom softwaretuning procedures at my discretion. Again Mr. Noll’s attempt tofalsify statements will be proven to be completely fictitious.Furthermore, the BMW technician that successfully and properlydiagnosed the crankshaft and camshaft correlation faults had done soby simply removing the crank hub and confirmed that the crank hub wasthe source of vanos fault codes. I have several pictures along with alengthy description of the BMW technician’s findings. All of whichwill demonstrate Mr. Noll’s lack of basic diagnostic protocol torepair a known issue that many BMW 335i cars experience. In fact, BMWmade a critical update in designing a new crank hub style whichutilizes integrated grip disks to the timing and oil pump sprockets.The BMW technician confirmed using my VIN # that my engine had an oldstyle crank hub which is known to fail. It is without question thatMr. Noll lacked basic knowledge and neglected to inspect vitalcomponents that directly affect camshaft timing. After presenting theissue and an explanation of my transaction with Mr. Noll to a few BMWtechnicians, it was communicated to me that it would be necessary forMr. Noll to participate in continuing education courses in basicdiagnosis so that he is able to make proper diagnoses in the future.

Mr.Noll’s response: Not soon thereafter Phuong asked for copies of alldata logs and a final invoice. It was communicated to Phuong numeroustimes through Facebook Messenger, Email, on the phone, and printed onhis final invoice the tuning on the engine was dangerously lean andwe recommended not driving it.

Dr.Vu’s response: I have 6 datalogs which will demonstrate that Mr.Noll continued to push the limits of car despite fuel trims beingmaxed out. I can provide all 6 datalogs that confirm Mr. Noll’slack of basic tuning parameters which has potentially caused internalmotor damage. In addition, I can provide email correspondence betweenthe custom sofware tuner he utilizes and myself where he describesMr. Noll’s inability to read basic tuning parameters. Again Mr.Noll under wide open throttle continued to accelerate my car wellpast 80 mph while being completely oblivious to the fueling beinginsufficient. This inattention was due to his inability to recognizethat the port fuel injectors were inactive. I have direct contactwith several knowledgeable custom software tuners in the communitythat will attest that Mr. Noll neglected to follow standard practiceand to record one datalog at a time and to make adjustments asneeded. Mr. Noll instead continued to take several datalogs of which6 were emailed to me. That does not include the other instances wherethe JB4 wasn’t activated to record the parameters. In consequence Iam left with a potentially damaged motor due to Mr. Noll deviatingfrom standard datalogging protocol. It is in the opinion of severaltuners that I am in direct with that Mr. Noll’s dataloggingsessions were done blindly and unnecessary engine damage may haveoccurred. More specifically there may have been unavoidable damage tothe pistons, ringlands, and cylinder walls if Mr. Noll had followedproper datalogging protocol.

Mr.Noll’s response: ABR did not build the engine in this vehicle. ABRdid not install any of the aftermarket accessories that wererequested to be estimated. ABR did not produce the tuning loaded intothe engines management computer. ABR requested authorization tocorrect the tuning so the vehicle could be extensively test drivenbut the client declined repeatedly.

Dr.Vu’s response: I have screenshots that will demonstrate Mr. Noll’sfutile attempt to make false statements. I have several Facebookmessenger screenshots where Mr. Noll stated that the car was idlingand running perfect and that custom software tuning can be done at mydiscretion. It is common knowledge that if the car has a mechanicalissue consistent with a failed crank hub assembly that it needs to berepaired first and foremost. After describing the recent history ofcamshaft timing failure with several knowledgeable BMW technicians,it is standard protocol that all mechanical issues are addressed andor repaired. Mr. Noll completely disregarded basic and standarddiagnosis protocol which has been frown down upon by theprofessionals I have been in direct and indirect communication. Mr.Noll was requested to inspect and correct vanos fault codes. He wasnot asked whether he built my engine. The BMW technician thatproperly diagnosed my crank hub issue has stated that Mr. Noll wasnegligent in following basic camshaft and crankshaft related faultcode diagnosis.

Mr.Noll’s response: Approximately a month later we were contacted thatthe engine had started having VANOS faults (variable valve timing)and accusations of improper work began to be cast in our direction;followed by this BBB report, citing we did not “fix crank hubassembly”. The crank hub assembly Phuong is referring to was nevera service that was approved. We could never test the engine at itsfull capacity because of the tuning service Phuong declined as well.We would not intentionally cause harm to a system we know is notcorrect.

Dr.Vu’s response: I have several Facebook messenger screenshots whereI requested multiple times for Mr. Noll to inspect a common failurepoint related to vanos fault codes. Mr. Noll repeatedly stated thatthe car was idling and running perfectly. I communicated to Mr. Nollthat I was uncomfortable with him not inspecting a known failurepoint within the crank hub assembly that has been linked to camshaftand crankshaft correlation fault codes. Mr. Noll refused to inspectthe crank hub stating that he had already timed the motor. This iswhere Mr. Noll made a critical error as the crank hub was preciselythe root cause of camshaft timing failure. All of which can beconfirmed by the BMW technician that properly diagnosed and repairedmy vehicle. I find it quite disturbing that Mr. Noll would purposelyignore proper procedural inspection protocol when it is standardpractice amongst BMW technicians. It is without question, Mr. Nollavoided extra work despite what the majority of BMW techniciansregard as standard diagnostic protocol for camshaft and crank shaftcorrelation faults given the recent history of a failed timing job.


Mr.Noll’s response: Phuong believes the issue with his engine is afaulty factory crank hub, which may have spun due to the considerablyhigher than factory power his engine generates, or faulty initialinstallation, which we believe is the latter. Whoever built theengine improperly installed it. Not ABR. If that is the case it hasno bearing on the work requested of, suggested, or carried out byABR. That is a matter to be taken up with the individual that builtthe engine. Furthermore, we had discussed with him on potentiallygoing into the engine to install an aftermarket keyed crank hubassembly to resolve his concern. However the part needed was not andis to this day still not available for purchase from the aftermarket.Phuong chose to pull his vehicle out of our shop before the productwas available to purchase.

Dr.Vu’s response: I thoroughly described to Mr. Noll that I had arecent camshaft timing job that failed. I also requested Mr. Noll toinspect my crank hub assembly in order to rule out the possibility ofa failed crank hub assembly producing the crank shaft to camshaftcorrelation faults. In addition, I have a screen shot on Facebookmessenger where I asked Mr. Noll the timeframe from which it would becompleted. He replied stating that it would be 1 to 2 months uponreceiving my vehicle. I waited in excess of 4 months with no mentionof my car potentially incurring a failed crank hub assembly. In fact,Mr. Noll stated that it is very unlikely that your motor would have afailed crank hub. This is precisely the main reason why I had shippedmy car from Kentucky to Texas to have it inspected. If I had knownthat Mr. Noll was planning to do the exact same timing job that arecent shop had performed, I would have never transported my vehiclethere for servicing. Furthermore, Mr. Noll is blatantly falsifyingstatements regarding an aftermarket crank hub for my car. During ourconversation, Mr. Noll described a company was in the midst ofpossibly providing a keyed crank hub solution for an entirelydifferent motor, more specifically the S55 BMW motor. I find it quitedisconcerting that Mr. Noll would continually falsify statementsconsidering that I have well documented screen shots to dispute themotherwise.

Mr.Noll’s response:
Mr.Vu also still owes us 500 dollars for the transport fee that was COD,which we did not collect on.
Mr.Vu performed a credit card charge back dispute. His credit cardcompany found it to be in our favor and awarded us the money back.
Mr.Vu has had poor business transactions in the industry we have learnedas well, and have communicated with those businesses.
Mr.Vu has posted this complaint and review in multiple social mediaplatforms which is not warranted. We simply did exactly what we weretold, and never anything that was not authorized.

Dr.Vu’s response: Mr. Noll believes that he has somehow provided mewith a $500 discount regarding the shipping from Kentucky to Texas. Iwas forwarded an invoice via email in which I paid in full. If Mr.Noll had included an additional $500 to the final invoice, I assureyou I would have paid that as well. This statement has no relevanceto Mr. Noll’s blatant omission to follow proper diagnostic protocolwhen a crankshaft and camshaft fault is under inspection. Inaddition, Mr. Noll is stating I have had bad transactions with othercompanies in this industry. I encourage Mr. Noll to find and presentevidence of this false claim. He will be in a futile search as hewill find that I have paid in full each and every product I purchasedin the BMW community. Meaning, I have no current or previousoutstanding invoices, claims or transactions.

Ithas recently come to my attention that Mr. Noll has provided inferiorbuilt motors on more than one occasion to reputable companies in theBMW N54 community. More specifically there is a 9 page discussion onthe BimmerBoost forum where Mr. Noll provided a substandard motor toVargas Turbo Technologies. It has been documented that Mr. Noll soldan engine with poorly fitting exhaust valves that caused severedamage to the cylinder head. The company openly and publiclydescribed Mr. Noll’s shoddy practices and is out over $10,000. As aconsequence, Vargas Turbo Technologies has had to reach out toanother BMW engine builder, more specifically Rebello Racing basedout of California. Furthermore, a reputable BMW engine buildingcompany in Houston Texas communicated to me that they are currentlyrepairing a similar failed engine issue that was recently built byABR Houston. If I had known that Mr. Noll would take short cuts anddeliberately ignore standard diagnostic protocol, I would have nevershipped my car for repairs.
Consequently,I paid for a service that was well below the standard of care in theindustry due to an improper diagnosis of a commonly known failurepoint related to camshaft and crankshaft correlation faults. Mr.Noll’s blatant negligence has resulted in me shipping my car toanother BMW technician to properly diagnose, repair, and deliver anexceptional service that should be mimicked by Mr. Noll. Incomparison, Mr. Noll readily creates false statements in which allcan be disproved and publicly mocks current and former customers onsocial media. It is in the strong opinion of the BMW technician thatproperly repaired my camshaft and crankshaft correlation faults thatMr. Noll should participate in continuing education courses so thathe will have the necessary skill sets and knowledge to diagnose astraightforward vanos fault code issue.

Mr.Noll’s response:For the reasons listed above ABR finds this BBB complaint to befraudulent. All work estimated and authorized was performed accordingto the accompanying final invoice. Transcripts of all writtencommunications with the client are in our possession, along withrecorded phone conversations as well to further complement our sideof the situation.

Dr.Vu’s response: I encourage Mr. Noll to provide the recordedcommunications so that it would corroborate each and every response Ihave provided within this transcript. I find it exceedingly repugnantthat Mr. Noll would voluntarily falsify statements in order toprotect his many lies. I am prepared to present Facebook screenshotsas well as a detailed description from the BMW technician thatproperly diagnosed my car issues and successful repair of my vehicle.
Thankyou BBB for providing an outlet for customers that have beendefrauded by companies such as ABR Houston. If you have any furtherquestions or require additional clarification, please do not hesitateto contact me for further details.

Sincerely,
Dr.Khac Phuong Vu.

General: VTT N54/N55 vacuum/boost adapter

$
0
0
Click here to enlarge

Click here to enlarge

Click here to enlarge

Click here to enlarge

Quote:

Originally Posted by VTT
We are happy to announce the release of our N54/N55(N55 Limited Fitment) vacuum/boost adapter. This simply takes our existing external PCV fitting we use for our Catch can kits. These go inline to the throttle body and provide a full boost and vacuum signal from the manifold. For this fitting we simply remove the -8 fitting, adding instead two 1/8NPT bungs to accept any fitting that has 1/8" NPT threads. We will offer as options, 1/4" barb, as well as 1/8NPT plugs if you only want one barb, etc. These are perfect for running your PI off manifold pressure which is much more accurate than charge pipe, and they are also great for BOV running the proper size line without having to drill a hole in your manifold. These do space out any sensors etc giving inaccurate readings like some of the other brands do. We have 200 of these in stock for immediate shipping. can be found here: https://vargasturbo.com/product/vtt-...boost-adapter/

N54: Low Boost

$
0
0
I have recently been having an issue with building boost. Before I would hit boost target (17psi) just fine, now it barely goes over 10. I had the car sit for 1-2 weeks as I just purchased an e39, and wanted to drive it around. Go to get back into it, let it warm up, and went to do a pull. Got 30FF code, and half engine light.

After checking all intake ducting, and verifying all vacuum lines aren't cracked. I'm stumped. Went out for dinner tonight on stock map, car built to 12 psi no issue. Flashed MHD Stage 2, and now it won't boost past 10 PSI, but now I'm not getting a 30FF code??

Knowing the symptoms of boost solenoids, I just don't see it being them, and honestly am dreading doing a turbo replacement right now. However I know I need to sooner or later, due to slight rattle.

Just wanted some more insight just in case I am over looking anything on the data side. Any input would be greatly appreciated,
Thanks

I am unable to share datazip link due to restriction, if you are willing to look I will gladly PM.

N54: Schrick Stage 1 Cam results

$
0
0
We have been testing the Shrick stage 1 cams for a few months now and after a few setbacks and issues not related to cams we have some preliminary results.

These are not the final results as I'm still fighting a random misfire which we think is an injector issue.

This is on Brintech Customs heart breaker dyno.

366 rkw run on stock cams at 27 to 28 psi on e20
372 rkw run on stage 1 cams at 22 to 23 psi on e20

This equates to around 600 to 650 us rwhp

One thing we found if your car has issues running these cams, these will amplify those and your tuner better know what he is doing thanks @V8Bait.

Goal was to reach 400rwk but I think the limitation is 93 and will never get there but will keep trying.

The surprising thing is we made the same power or 5 psi less boost which will help the turbos last much longer.

Running a small blend like e40 will help run even less boost whilst retaining the same power output and not sacrificing reliability.

The engine specs.

9.5 to 1 compression
PPM forged rods and pistons
Stock head
Shrick Stage 1 cams
Baffled Sump
Vac Motorsports head studs
Vtt Spline lock v2

Otherwise internally stock with no fancy block work or anything like that.

They reopen the track late September so we should get some trap speeds then but aim is to hit 130mph on e20.

Nothing really special but enough power to break our 2nd gearbox where the 3rd gear just exploded into pieces.

We are going to lower the initial boost and mid range eventually to prolong the life of the gearbox but atm we are not holding back.

The boost is capped initially on spool to stop the car breaking traction as its a major issue.

Why we also installed the cams was to get the car to keep making power to redline whilst the stock ones just taper off.

Once you drive on the babies you will never go back to stock as they just pull so hard from idle and make 20 psi by 2600rpm caped on VTT Gc's 2.0

https://datazap.me/u/martymil/log-15...og=0&data=3-22
Attached Images
 

N54: stand alone msd80

$
0
0
hey guys . New here from nz. I'm searching for a way to make my msd80 stand alone . All dsc,cas etc deleted. I'm putting the engine into a e46 drift car. Cheers kerry.
Viewing all 12473 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images